astro
11-01-2006, 05:02 PM
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=486#comments
Comments on the Superstring Syndrome (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/nakanishi1.pdf) (also from May 1986)
“Superstring Theory” Syndrome (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/nakanishi2.pdf) (published in the popular magazine “Parity”, September 1986)
Can the superstring theory become physics? (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/nakanishi3.pdf) (January 1993)
This last paper claims that “the bubble of superstring theory has … bursted”, which, in 1993, was rather premature.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=486#comments
Comments on the Superstring Syndrome (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/nakanishi1.pdf) (also from May 1986)
“Superstring Theory” Syndrome (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/nakanishi2.pdf) (published in the popular magazine “Parity”, September 1986)
Can the superstring theory become physics? (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/nakanishi3.pdf) (January 1993)
This last paper claims that “the bubble of superstring theory has … bursted”, which, in 1993, was rather premature.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=486#comments