PDA

View Full Version : Baez shows Brian Greene is a Crackpot


astro
12-05-2006, 02:14 PM
Baez shows Brian Greene is a Crackpot

Read full story at: kuro5hin.org/story/2006/10/31/161746/39

<LI value=30>30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.

"Even on his deathbed [Einstein] scribbled equations in the desperate but fading hope that the theory would finally materialize. It didn't." <LI value=34>40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike. "Finally, some have argued that if, after decades of research involving thousands of scientists, the theory is still a work in progress, it's time to give up." (One might ask whether this question gets a pass, too, since such opinions have in fact been expressed by reputable people.)
50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions. "To be sure, no one successful experiment would establish that string theory is right, but neither would the failure of all such experiments prove the theory wrong."
Certainly, Dr. Greene has been been working for a long time (10) on a paradigm shift (10), towards which Einstein struggled on his deathbed (30). For his effort, his theory has no equations (10) and no tests (50). With the starting credit, that much makes 105 points.

Read full story at: kuro5hin.org/story/2006/10/31/161746/39

Mr. Robin Parsons
12-05-2006, 04:42 PM
Ha ha hahahahaha :D (I) like that.

Cute.

(funny too thought (I) fit some of those criteria....a little Cap-Cap-Cap)

(I) have one too...

(I) Say A + B = C does not work in all conditions. :confused:

Even in compumber Codee A + B = C:\ does NOT hold true for all cases.

Prove that! :eek:

(Tee Hee :p )

Mr. Robin Parsons
12-06-2006, 02:06 PM
(I) Say A + B = C does not work in all conditions. :confused:

Even in compumber Codee A + B = C:\ does NOT hold true for all cases.

Prove that! :eek: (In the Spirit of the Joke)

Hey! if no one ever answers my challenge, doesn't that make me the smartest mathematician that ever lived?

And my paradigm shift will change the esesentials of all models of science ....so long as (I) can get them to stop the conspiracy against all of my work (which none of them have never read) as it won't prove that they are any smarter then me because that math Model proves that (I) am smarter then any string theorist living!! :p


(It's Just a JOKE!)


Even better (I) say that A MINUS b = C is not true for all cases/conditions....


Heh-heh-heh prove THAT one!! :eek: :eek:

Mr. Robin Parsons
12-10-2006, 11:08 AM
© Mr. Robin Parsons :cool: Kingston Ontario Canada MMVI

So lets try this one, you be the 'Crackpot' Hunter, tell us all if this is crackpot or real....

A² + b² = C² Pythagorean theorem & Fermats' Last theroem...

So in A^n + B^n = C^n prove that for all values of N > 2 (N greater then 2) there is NO solution...

add Pi, so (Pi)A^n + (Pi)B^n = (Pi)C^n

now, we know that for (Pi)A² + (Pi)B² = (Pi)C² equals the area of Circle A and Circle B as Equaling the Area of Circle C ERGO: two circles areas as having congruence upon a resultant circles' area

We also know that for ANY value of n greater then 2, we will no longer be describing a Circle hence the resultant (The rule) fails so we now have a proof of something, and by it's negation (negation of a/the rule)

So, As any value of N being greater then two, no longer describes a circle, we know that any value of n Greater then two (2) will not work!

Hence we have proven something....

You be the judge....


P.S. As stricture of Mathematical Logic/Reason/Reasonings used in math this works Just fine.....but it feels 'funny' but as logic and reason work, it works!

Crackpot or Jackpot?

Mr. Robin Parsons
12-11-2006, 11:17 AM
(I) Say A + B = C does not work in all conditions.
Even in compumber Codee A + B = C:\ does NOT hold true for all cases.
Prove that! :eek:
(Tee Hee :p )(This is COMPLETELY speculation {AKA guessing/madeup}) So in the above posting (#4) we have Fermat himself, sitting there, thinking this one through, figures it might make a good 'joke' with a friend, to try that one on them, it ends up getting Waaaaaay greater circulation then Fermat ever dreamed, never-mind people are getting angry in trying to solve it, so when it comes time that someone asks Fermat, he decides it is too dangerous to tell them that this (Add Pi) is the manner in which he sorta played a little bit with math theory as to establish that proof.....(This is COMPLETELY speculation)

It is plausible, yet (I) have no idea (?) if that is Actually the 'truth of it' as opposed to something that just sounds really good, and works to fit the criteria...


So in the Spirit of that one, the first Question (I) proposed...

A + B = C does NOT work in all cases/conditions :confused:

So Let A = 2
Let B = 3
Let C = 17

So 2 + 3 ≠ 17

There, it is proven! :eek:

(Gotta think outside of the Box....neat trick eh? :p )