PDA

View Full Version : String Theory in a Nutshell is Based on a False Premise

astro
11-07-2007, 04:18 AM
"It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite(1). FOOTNOTE(1): there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite." --String Theory in a Nutshell by Elias Kiritsis

The entire book String Theory in a Nutshell by Elias Kiritsis is based on fraud almost admitted to in the first footnote. MDT pwn3d 57r1ng5

The first page of String Theory in a Nutshell by Elias Kiritsis states:
"THE CASE FOR STRING THEORY:
String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite.(1)"

THE FIRST PARAGRAPH IS FOOTNOTED.

THE FOOTNOTE SAYS THAT THE PARAGRAPH IS NOT TRUE. LEE SMOLIN ALSO SHOWS THAT STRING THEORY IS NOT A FINITE THEORY--CHECK OUT HIS BOOK.

THE FOOTNOTE STATES:
"Although there is no rigorous proff to all orders that the theory is UV finite, there are several all-orders arguments as well as rigorous results at low-loop-order. In closed string theory, amplitudes must be carefully defined via analytic continuation, standard in S-matrix theory. When open strings are present, there are diveregences. However, they are interpreted as IR divergences (due to the exchange of massless tsates) in the dual closed string channel. They are subtracted in the "Wilsonian" S-matrix elements.

NOTE THE BRILLIANT USE OF FOOTNOTES, PARENTHESES, AND QUOTATION MARKS.

Awesome--let us juxtapose the first sentences of the paragraph with the first sentence of the footnote: "String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite. FOOTNOTE: there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

Can you believe this? Read it again:
"String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite. FOOTNOTE: there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

This is amazing people. Imagine Einstein trying to pull this stunt. Or Newton. Or Bohr, and then writing 600+ more pages. Read it again:

"String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite. FOOTNOTE: there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

So it is that the rest of the 600+ page book is a complete hoax. It only gets worse from there--more convoluted, more nonsensical, more dishonest, more "ironic," more snarky, more deceptive, and more tragic.

Again: "It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite(1). FOOTNOTE(1): there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

String Theorists are the worst kind of con artists there are. And yet you will never hear Baez snarking them, as they oversee his funding. Baez and his grad studnets only snark indie thinkers and indie physicists. Baez prefers meaningless math over logic, reason, and physics--google "Baez Hamsters."

They took a once noble field--physics--the very paragon of natural philosophy, and they killed it, all for the sake of groupthink funding and hatred of Truth and Beauty.

MDT is here to change it all.

Moving Dimensions Theory needs no footnotes.

MDT is the best-tested theory of all time.

MDT predicts Einstein's postulates with a *physical* model.

MDT predicts entropy with a *physical* model.

MDT predicts action-at-a distance with a *physical* model.

MDT predicts that the maximum velocity in the universe is c.

MDT predicts that all photons travel at the velcoity c.

MDT predicts that an object's velocity through spacetime is always c. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.

MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the three spatial dimensions is to move with a velocity of c relative to the fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.

MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the fourth expanding dimension is to move with the velocity c relative to the three spatial dimensions. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.

MDT predicts the equivalence of mass and energy. Matter, when rotated into the fourth expanding dimension, appears as photons.

MDT predicts the constant speed of light. The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c. Hence the speed of matter rotated into the the fourth dimension is c.

MDT predicts wave particle duality. As matter expands in the fourth dimension in the form of a photon, it appears as a spherically-symmetric wavefront. When it is perturbed, it is collapsed, and brought into the the three stationary spatial dimensions.

MDT predicts entropy--the fundamental motion of the universe is the spherically-symmetric wavefront defiend by the fourth dimenion expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions--hence entropy. Two particles at a similar origin have a probability to move aprt.

MDT predicts the null vector for photons, and the - sign in the space-time metric. As the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, the only way to have zero interval is to move with teh origin--at the speed of light.

MDT unfreezes time. Time, as we consider it, is not the fourth dimension, but it is an emrgent property of a fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. This confusion of time iwththe actual fourth dimension has lead to Godel's paradox and the block-universe, which although they have provided Paul Davies with a lucrative living for his fantasies and science fiction, are not real. Barbour gets close to this.

Moving dimensions theory predicts that as objects move, they will appear shorter. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, so as an object is rotated into the fourth dimension, it will appear shorter in the three spatial dimensions, and too, it will translate or gain velocity in the direction of its forshortening.

Moving dimensions theory predicts that the measurement of the state of a photon can instaneously affect the state of a distant photon, when those two photons were initially interacting. This is because although they are now distant in space, they are yet at the same place in the expanding fourth dimension.

MDT does not predict wormholes, nor multiverses, nor stringy strings, nor M-theroy, and thus it is to be utterly detested by the machine. MDT would underly all apsects of String Thoery, and MDT does explain an interpretation of higher, numerous dimensions, if needed by Klein et al.

MDT predicts the gravitational red shift. A photon emitted in a region of streched spacetime will maintain its wavelength as it travels away from the mass, thus appearing red-shifted.

MDT unifies the dualities--space and time, energy and mass, waves and particles--all can be expalined by MDT's simple postulate--the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.

Quantum mechanics, relativity, and entropy all derive from moving dimensions theory.

The purpose of physics has ever been to unify and explain via deeper, fundamental, physical models, and that's what MDT provides.

MDT demonstrates that time is an emergent phenomena, based upon a fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.

And MDT has a simple equation:

d(x4)/dt = ic

http://physicsmathforums.com

the entire book String Theory in a Nutshell by Elias Kiritsis is based on fraud almost admitted to in the first footnote. MDT pwn3d 57r1ng5

The first page states:
THE CASE FOR STRING THEORY:
String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite.(1)

THE FIRST PARAGRAPH IS FOOTNOTED.

THE FOOTNOTE SAYS THAT THE PARAGRAPH IS NOT TRUE. LEE SMOLIN ALSO SHOWS THAT STRING THEORY IS NOT A FINITE THEORY--CHECK OUT HIS BOOK.

THE FOOTNOTE STATES:
"Although there is no rigorous proff to all orders that the theory is UV finite, there are several all-orders arguments as well as rigorous results at low-loop-order. In closed string theory, amplitudes must be carefully defined via analytic continuation, standard in S-matrix theory. When open strings are present, there are diveregences. However, they are interpreted as IR divergences (due to the exchange of massless tsates) in the dual closed string channel. They are subtracted in the "Wilsonian" S-matrix elements.

NOTE THE BRILLIANT USE OF FOOTNOTES, PARENTHESES, AND QUOTATION MARKS.

Awesome--let us juxtapose the first sentences of the paragraph with the first sentence of the footnote: "String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite. FOOTNOTE: there is no rigorous proff to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

Can you believe this? Read it again:
"String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite. FOOTNOTE: there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

This is amazing people. Imagine Einstein trying to pull this stunt. Or Newton. Or Bohr, and then writing 600+ more pages. Read it again:

"String Theory has been the leading candidate over the past two decades for a theory that consistently unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. It gained popularity because it provides a theory that is UV finite. FOOTNOTE: there is no rigorous proof to all orders that the theory is UV finite."

So it is that the rest of the 600+ page book is a complete hoax. It only gets worse from there--more convoluted, more nonsensical, more dishonest, more "ironic," more snarky, more deceptive, and more tragic.

String Theorists are the worst kind of con artists there are. And yet you will never hear Baez snarking them, as they oversee his funding. Baez and his grad studnets only snark indie thinkers and indie physicists. Baez prefers meaningless math over logic, reason, and physics--google "Baez Hamsters."

They took a once noble field--physics--the very paragon of natural philosophy, and they killed it, all for the sake of groupthink funding and hatred of Truth and Beauty.

MDT is here to change it all.

Moving Dimensions Theory needs no footnotes.

MDT is the best-tested theory of all time.

MDT predicts Einstein's postulates with a *physical* model.

MDT predicts entropy with a *physical* model.

MDT predicts action-at-a distance with a *physical* model.

MDT predicts that the maximum velocity in the universe is c.

MDT predicts that all photons travel at the velcoity c.

MDT predicts that an object's velocity through spacetime is always c. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.

MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the three spatial dimensions is to move with a velocity of c relative to the fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.

MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the fourth expanding dimension is to move with the velocity c relative to the three spatial dimensions. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.

MDT predicts the equivalence of mass and energy. Matter, when rotated into the fourth expanding dimension, appears as photons.

MDT predicts the constant speed of light. The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c. Hence the speed of matter rotated into the the fourth dimension is c.

MDT predicts wave particle duality. As matter expands in the fourth dimension in the form of a photon, it appears as a spherically-symmetric wavefront. When it is perturbed, it is collapsed, and brought into the the three stationary spatial dimensions.

MDT predicts entropy--the fundamental motion of the universe is the spherically-symmetric wavefront defiend by the fourth dimenion expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions--hence entropy. Two particles at a similar origin have a probability to move aprt.

MDT predicts the null vector for photons, and the - sign in the space-time metric. As the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, the only way to have zero interval is to move with teh origin--at the speed of light.

MDT unfreezes time. Time, as we consider it, is not the fourth dimension, but it is an emrgent property of a fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. This confusion of time iwththe actual fourth dimension has lead to Godel's paradox and the block-universe, which although they have provided Paul Davies with a lucrative living for his fantasies and science fiction, are not real. Barbour gets close to this.

Moving dimensions theory predicts that as objects move, they will appear shorter. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, so as an object is rotated into the fourth dimension, it will appear shorter in the three spatial dimensions, and too, it will translate or gain velocity in the direction of its forshortening.

Moving dimensions theory predicts that the measurement of the state of a photon can instaneously affect the state of a distant photon, when those two photons were initially interacting. This is because although they are now distant in space, they are yet at the same place in the expanding fourth dimension.

MDT does not predict wormholes, nor multiverses, nor stringy strings, nor M-theroy, and thus it is to be utterly detested by the machine. MDT would underly all apsects of String Thoery, and MDT does explain an interpretation of higher, numerous dimensions, if needed by Klein et al.

MDT predicts the gravitational red shift. A photon emitted in a region of streched spacetime will maintain its wavelength as it travels away from the mass, thus appearing red-shifted.

MDT unifies the dualities--space and time, energy and mass, waves and particles--all can be expalined by MDT's simple postulate--the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.

Quantum mechanics, relativity, and entropy all derive from moving dimensions theory.

The purpose of physics has ever been to unify and explain via deeper, fundamental, physical models, and that's what MDT provides.

MDT deomstrates that time is an emergent phenomena.

And MDT has a simple equation:

d(x4)/dt = ic

http://physicsmathforums.com (http://physicsmathforums.com/)