Pulsoid Theory is . . .

[Epsilon=One]

The development and
an understanding of
Pulsoid Theory . . . a Paradigm Shift!,
and its philosophy, Conceptualism,
required and requires, a pencil; paper;
a little imagination; high school,
beginning algebra and geometry; and,
above all . . . freedom from the bias of
Standard Models of
Science, Theology, and Philosophy.

(If no image appears below, "Click" your browser "Refresh" icon.)

................

Pulsoid Theory is . . .

. . . a theory that rationalizes all the observed manifestations of Reality in accordance with the principles of IPSO.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) has stood the test of time; as, its primary concepts have been unchallenged by academia for over fifty years.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is a complete theory that rationalizes the Natural environment as being in equilibrium such that a Big Bang is not a requirement for a structural force opposed to the force commonly referred to as gravity. Pulsoid Theory's (PT) mathematics, physics, and logic can be visualized and understood by most laypersons.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) involves new mathematical concepts of "emergence" and fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) that should rejuvenate fundamental mathematics and all of theoretical physics from conventional relativity and quantum theory to alternative theory; such as, String Theory (ST); its derivatives; and, Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG).

Pulsoid Theory (PT) theorizes space that is referred to as the Dyosphere, as emerging and compressing, dynamic quanta that are analogous to the enigmatic "dark" energy (DE), "dark" matter (DM), and quantum "fields" (QF) that are observed manifestation that are referred to as Pulsoids.

The complex internal motion of Pulsoids manifest as the strong and weak interactions of quantum theory (QT). The external motions of Pulsoids manifest as Light (photons/bosons), Cosmic gravity, and its reaction . . . Cosmic Inertia.

Pulsoids consist of complex, harmonic oscillations that are referred to as Triquametric motion, that creates resonances, that are referred to as Resoloids, that manifest as mass; which, when said Pulsoids are critically compressed, within quasars and gamma-ray bursts, some of said Resoloids are ejected and dissipate as radiant energy quanta, atoms, and subatomic particles.

Because of the simplicity of its source and the simple, dynamic, double-ellipsoidal geometry of its emergence, the Pulsoid’s structure is orthogonal; and, cyclic energy transfers to the resonances such that the Pulsoid, also, is the “clock” that sets, and generates, the uniform iterations of fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT).

The dynamic, geometric process of emergence and dissipation of Pulsoids is an unending cycle, which, “while along the way,” the Pulsoids interact, evolve, and dissipate; thus, manifesting as all the phenomena within the Universe . . . including intelligent consciousness, which is heuristically described as complex, analog, self-adjustment (CASA).

The Elliptical Constant (EC), at the crux of Pulsoid Theory (PT),
resurrects String Theory and resuscitates Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG).

An expansion of the stated general concepts . . .

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is a theory of quantized space in which pulsing quanta, Pulsoids, form, from the emergence of seminal motion, such that said motion manifests as hyper-relativistic, non-local, complex oscillating, Triquametric motion that is subsequent to the dynamic, emergent, separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere. The totality of the quantized space is referred to as the Dyosphere.

Externally, the intact Pulsoids react relativistically; internally, and after Critical Compression, the Pulsoid and its dissipates are hyper-relativistic and the laws of quantum mechanics are applicable.

The Pulsoids' pulses are non-local, while the quantum, itself, and the internal and expanding ejected resonances, as their near relativistic speed decelerates, in uniformly discrete units that are set by www.101123.com/FIT]fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) and are referred to as Conceptual Units, which are heuristically described by:

the Elliptical Constant (EC), εpsilon = One.

The Elliptical Constant (EC) is the precise geometric construction of Wien's displacement law's "energy element," "ε," that Planck mathematically described as the minimal quantum and constant. Thus, in Pulsoid Theory (PT), the Planck constant is set as the Natural integer, One, "1," and is referred to as:

εpsilon = One.

The Conceptual Unit (CU), εpsilon = One, geometrically resolves Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem (GIT).

Pulsoid Theory (PT) rationalizes Cosmic gravitational attraction as several secondary, direct forces that are ultimately derived from hyper-relativistic "fundamental reactions" to the elastic-like, symmetrical, unbalanced, complex oscillating, dynamic motion of separation that manifests as pulses between an indivisible, dimensionless point within an indivisible, dimensionless sphere, which is often referred to as quantum gravity, which manifests as the Standard Model strong interaction.

Because of the indivisibleness of the dimensionless point and the dimensionless sphere's source, Infinity), there is complete conservation and equilibrium within the Universe.

Reality can be said to be the entanglement of said oscillating, string-like manifestations (OSM) of the motion of separation.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) includes the reconcilable, salient features of Relativity theory (SR & GR), Quantum mechanics’ (QM) field theory (QFT) through quantum chromodynamics’ (QCD) super symmetry theory (SUSY), String theory (ST) and its related theories such as M-brane theory (MT), Loop quantum gravity theory (LQG), and even, some of the concepts of the more recent: Moving Dimensions theory (MDT).

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is the only theory that:

..1.) Has no ad hoc postulates beyond the simple geometry and source of Emergent Ellipsoids and philosophical logic.

..2.) Provides theory that cannot be further reduced beyond the dynamic, emergent separation (DES) of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere as heuristically described by Dynamic, Hyper-relativistic Vectors (DHV).

..3.) Is internally reconcilable to the limits of mathematics; and, externally reconcilable to the observed logic of all Standard Models.

..4.) Defines the distinction between the infinite, the infinitesimal, and Infinity.

..5.) Explains why there is "something rather than nothing" as the inevitable consequence of "nothing" being a singularity.

..6.) Describes a simple, Natural manifestation, the Pulsoid, that incorporates all the fundamental concepts of everything that exists.

..7.) Explains a steady-state, unending, cycling Universe that refutes Big Bang theory.

..8.) Explains simply and clearly why there is accelerating, galactic recession that is closely related to the galactic retention of orbiting stars without mythical, metaphysical, large-magnitude black holes.

..9.) Explains the precise, original, and unique, Emergent Ellipsoidal geometry and algebra (v = εP² and c² = 2v² – s² of fundamental quanta as the origin of the fundamental, complex oscillations of slide, swing, and vibration.

10.) Explains how the resonances of harmonic formations of Triquametric motion create fermions (gravitational particles of mass) and subsequent bosons (massless particles of radiant energy).

11.) Explains the Natural source, and evolution, of the Inverse Square Law (ISL); orthogonal dimensions; and fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) as the manifestation of a “clock” that generates “ticks” of Conceptual Units (CU).

12.) Explains the generation of a fundamental unit that is the foundation for, and analogous to, all the Planck constants; and which, is the harmonic denominator of fundamental resonance.

13.) Explains why the smallest manifestation of existence has a radius that must be larger than the Conceptual Unit that is analogous to the Planck constant.

14.) Explains the containment of the Universe and its Congeneric Realms of Reality of unending coalescence, propagation, compression, and dissipation.

15.) Explains the source of numbers and arithmetical manipulations; such that: mathematics is a Natural function of the physical environment; and, thus: Why mathematics can precisely describe Nature.

16.) Explains why their can be utmost precision in describing Cosmic dimensions as multiples of the Conceptual Unit/Planck constant.

17.) Explains the origins of, and why, the revised Fibonacci sequence, the Golden ratio, the Natural function, x² – x, and the soliton are ubiquitous throughout Nature.

18.) Explains the relationship between pi, "π," and the Elliptical Constant, "ε"; and thus, their relationship to Nature and the infinite.

19.) Explains all observed, non-local phenomena as manifestations of hyper-relativistic motion that is without dimensions.

20.) Explains the genesis of the orthogonal dimensions and "time" in a non-circular manner as the only fundamental dimensions of unlimited dimensions.

21.) Explains the genesis of the "clock" that creates the uniform "ticks" of the Conceptual Unit that manifests as fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT).

22.) Explains Cosmic Inertia as a force that is a reaction to one of gravity’s secondary force manifestations.

23.) Explains the illusion of gravity's attraction-at-a-distance as a combination of fundamental, non-local and secondary forces that all act directly on their object.

24.) Explains the complex half-spin of fermions as a consequence of a quantum's internal, acute and obtuse dual ellipsoidal "envelope" that is referred to as an Emergent Ellipsoid that is comprised of non-local, hyper-relativistic, Triquametric motion.

25.) Explains the spin of bosons as a consequence of the geometric phenomenon of traumatic ejection from an Emergent Ellipsoids.

26.) Explains the ephemeral, non-local manifestations of subatomic particles as the consequence of hyper-relativistic accelerating and decelerating pulses of quanta that pulse as a consequence of the indivisible nature of Infinity.

27.) Explains why the speed of light only appears to be constant; and, the genesis of its constant deceleration, that is discrete and with speed inversely proportional to its time of dissipation.

28.) Explains "red-shift" as a consequence of the amplitude (minor diameter) increase of an ejected Resoloid; said ejected Resoloid is referred to as a photon.

29.) Explains the geometry and mathematics of the "fabric of space"/aether as the Dyosphere, which is heuristically described by Tini Circle Groups (TCG) that are dynamic, tangent, infinite, spheroids of compressing, emergent ellipsoids, with integer curvature[/url] ("dark" matter), that is permeated with dissipating, ejected Resoloids that carry spheroidal, pulsing resonances (radiant energy).

30.) Explains the etiology of quasars and gamma-ray bursts as the Critical Compression of "dark" matter.

31.) Explains the genesis of the ubiquitous, enigmatic, isotropic, ultra-high-energy, background radiation.

32.) Explains the source of anomalous cosmic rays.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is as testable as any of the theories or Standard Models that it modifies; especially in that, its most fundamental concepts are neither paradoxical, illogical, metaphysical, or unprovable.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) refutes Kurt Gödel, Thomas S. Kuhn, and Karl Popper's contention that all knowledge is contrived and ultimately unprovable. True physical knowledge is not contrived, theoretical inventions . . . as is: most all current theoretical physics.

True physical knowledge is a superstructure of discoveries from observation and rigorous philosophical and mathematical logic that is supported by Natural, irreducible postulates.

Thus, "science does not end" until science is united with Theology and Philosophy. As such, the triad is referred to as Conceptualism.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is consistent with all observation and philosophical logic such that Science, Theology, and Philosophy (STP) are united. (IPSO)

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is comprised of fundamental concepts that have not been publicly challenged by world-class academics for over fifty years.

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is quintessentially
complete and beautiful;
thus, in every manner
..................... . . . a Paradigm Shift!

Glossary of Pulsoid Theory's (PT) unique, salient concepts

Brunardot Series (BS)
Brunardot Theorem (BT) c² = 2v² – s²
Brunardot Triangles
CASA
Conceptual Unit (CU)
Confluent Congruence (CC)
Congeneric Realms of Reality (CRR)
Cosmic Inertia (CI)
Critical Coalescence (CCo)
Critical Compression (CrC)
Dynamic Separation (DS)
Dyosphere
Ellipses
...Brunardot (BE)
...Conceptual (CE)
...Emergent (EE)
...Lemma (LE)
...Pulsoidal (PE)
...Ultron (UE)
Elliptical Constant (EC)
Equilibrium Theory of Reality (ETR)
Fibonacci sequence, revised (rFs)
Fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT)
Infinity
IPSO
Natural function (NF) (x² - x)
Pulsoid
Pulsoid Theorem (PT) v = εP²
Reality
Relative, Hierarchic Compression (RHC)
Resoloid
Seminal motion (SM)
Science, Theology, Philosophy are One
Triquametric motion (TM)

An acknowledgement of profuse thanks to: Philip Morrison, Mario Rabinowitz, Linus Pauling, and Eliot McGucken for their trying to comprehend, important support, and undoubtedly, unintended encouragement. I will never fully understand "why?" their kindness; though, I do know that they certainly are "far from the madding crowd's ignoble strife..." The errors and unfinished "tweaking" are the sole responsibility of Brunardot.

The expansion and clarification, herein, will continue as time allows.

Also, there is much that is relevant . . . and some that is not . . . that can be found within the threads posted at this forum's topic: Pulsoid Theory; and, elsewhere throughout PhysicsMathForums.com's dialogues.

See:
Pulsoid Theory Overview
Pulsoid Theory Summary

©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: PhysicsMathForums .com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.

Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.

Please ask questions.

With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.



If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.

[ste]

Originally Posted by Epsilon=One

Pulsoid Theory (PT) is a theory of quantized space in which pulsing quanta, Pulsoids, form from the emergence of seminal motion such that said motion manifests as hyper-relativistic, non-local, complex oscillating, Triquametric motion that is subsequent to the dynamic separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere. The totalality of the quantized space is referred to as the Dyosphere.

Mind explaining a "dimensionless sphere"? Sounds rather spaced out to me.

You post page upon page of theoretical ideas and explanations, which is all good and dandy. But as far as I can tell, you've come up with no testable hypothesis, nor provided any experimental evidence to support any of your claims (which is most likely why you have not garnered any serious academic interest.)

Also, you claim somewhere that it is easy for laymen to understand the theory, and I can acurately say that I don't have a clear understanding it. It would help if you give an outline either in the form of a visual diagram connecting your concepts, or a short summary of the theory in a paragraph or two.

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by ste

Mind explaining a "dimensionless sphere"? Sounds rather spaced out to me.

Something like a dimensionless point . . . with a radius that is equal to, or less than, the Conceptual Unit (CU) that is analogous to the Planck constant. It heuristically describes Infinity.

Originally Posted by ste

You post page upon page of theoretical ideas and explanations, which is all good and dandy.

Thank you.

Originally Posted by ste

But as far as I can tell, you've come up with no testable hypothesis, nor provided any experimental evidence to support any of your claims

I can understand why you may so perceive. However, a careful reading of these posts, which I also believe to be tedious, should indicate otherwise. There are many testable hypotheses beginning with mathematics itself . . . which is better than any Standard Model can offer.

You can begin with: Quantitative Proof of Pulsoid Theory.

Originally Posted by ste

...(which is most likely why you have not garnered serious academic interest.)

Anyone that understands the inner workings of academic theoretical physics at the highest levels would have many more ideas about why the "ignore"-ance of Pulsoid Theory concepts for over 50 years.

Originally Posted by ste

...you claim somewhere that it is easy for laymen to understand the theory, and I can acurately say that I don't have a clear understanding it.

That is my fault. And, to a lesser degree, probably, your inability to unlearn what has been impressed upon you.

Because, I have been compelled to "spotty" presentation, the concepts are not tied together as they should be. This is why I ask for questions (Thank you!!!). I try to write so that every paragraph can be "interpreted" by the layperson; when I fail, as is too often the case, I WANT questions; I want what is weakly explained to be exposed.

Originally Posted by ste

It would help if you give an outline either in the form of a visual diagram connecting your concepts, or a short summary of the theory in a paragraph or two.

I understand exactly what you are saying. Years ago (10-15) I spent about $500.00 on printing and postage per month for years doing just what you ask. In addition, I visited many times about 7 top university's (and many more lesser ones) math, physics, and philosophy departments where I was occasionally invited to group discussions with postgrads. There was only "ignore"-ance except for a small following of some world-class persons that could do little to help . . . other than give great support to my psyche.

[ste]

The image shown above is tiny (250x241 pixels), and unreadable from this size. A larger version would be nice. Also, on this page, your legend refers to variables (K, P) that don't exist in the shown image, but may exist in the above one (I can barely make out a "K"). It would help if, instead of explaining the variables in words, you could include them in the image to assist in the visualization of a pulsoid. Or, perhaps, having a visual legend. Note: The orange "vectors" in the image on the linked page do not have arrows indicating their direction.

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by ste

The image shown above is tiny (250x241 pixels), and unreadable from this size. A larger version would be nice. Also, on this page, your legend refers to variables (K, P) that don't exist in the shown image, but may exist in the above one (I can barely make out a "K"). It would help if, instead of explaining the variables in words, you could include them in the image to assist in the visualization of a pulsoid. Or, perhaps, having a visual legend. Note: The orange "vectors" in the image on the linked page do not have arrows indicating their direction.

You are absolutely correct.

My images are rushed, incomplete, and often, not appropriate.

This one was "thrown-in" only for ambiance.

For a year no one has asked. When I post ad hoc much has not been tweaked. If no one pays attention, I just move on to another topic.

Keep holding my feet to the fire.

I'll try to improve something tomorrow. The images are simple; however, difficult to portray in 2-D; and, my time is limited to produce better animations. Sorry.

[ste]

Originally Posted by Epsilon=One

My images are rushed, incomplete, and often, not appropriate.

That's fine. We all have lives, etc. But if you ever want to get this thing off the ground, provisioins have to be made. I'm not trying to be fussy, I'm just trying to make this as presentable as possible for your readers and critics.

By the way, have you ever heard of software called "Geometer's sketchpad"?

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by ste

I'm just trying to make this as presentable as possible for your readers and critics.

I understand. Your help is greatly appreciated. My computer time is not long enough to proof read as much as I should.

Originally Posted by ste

By the way, have you ever heard of software called "Geometer's sketchpad"?

Not until now. Thanks for tip.

[Talvi Watia]

Originally Posted by ste

Mind explaining a "dimensionless sphere"? Sounds rather spaced out to me.

You post page upon page of theoretical ideas and explanations, which is all good and dandy. But as far as I can tell, you've come up with no testable hypothesis, nor provided any pair.com/willisb/millikan/experiment.html experimental evidence to support any of your claims (which is most likely why you have not garnered any serious academic interest.)

Also, you claim somewhere that it is easy for laymen to understand the theory, and I can acurately say that I don't have a clear understanding it. It would help if you give an outline either in the form of a visual diagram connecting your concepts, or a short summary of the theory in a paragraph or two.

they exist. **see AntideSitter space.

[ste]

It's hard to understand your concepts if you don't define them using a common ground. If you are going to be speaking to those whom you know will have ideas and biases regarding what is accepted, provide reason to think otherwise.

The way you are defining your neologisms is interdependent on each other (PEP, for example, a term that has not even been defined yet, which doesn't stop you from using it in an explanation). I take this page (or this, this, this, this, this, or this) as a further example of your habit of linking to insufficiently defined terms (or not even defined at all). The gaps must be filled in order to understand what is going on (either that, or formulate your explanation in such a way that rationalizes the basics without the jargon of new ideas which depend on another definition to fully understand).

Simply stating that conventional units and paradigms are contrived is insufficient. Take classical mechanics; Although historically superseded by quantum mechanics, the system is deterministic and considered accurate for "ordinary" and practical applications. Many problems that would otherwise be unimaginably difficult with quantum mechanics are easily explained through classical mechanics, hence the reason why it is used. The bottom line is that it "works", so unless you have an alternative that works any "better", then why should PT be pursued?

Using geometry to prove geometric or mathematical curiosities (such as a number system) is one thing. BUT how does this relate to physics at all? There is a gap between geometry and what is out there. Same problem applies to pulsoids. And how can one assume that the geometry (regardless of how beautiful, logical, intuitive) describes or rationalizes the motion through which you claim pulsoids are manifested in? How could one possibly make the leap from proving a geometric truth to displaying a physical one?

I've seen the elliptical constant. I agree that its mathematical beauty is astounding. I just need something to translate those ideas or thoughts to our physical surroundings. The mathematics and geometry of the pulsoid at this point are speculative at most, of the universe (if only I could understand WHAT they were speculating). Why should nature have a proclivity for natural numbers? If derived geometrically, on what basis can you assert that they exist anywhere beyond the realm of a chalkboard?

You preach simplicity, but where is it shown? I have seen no practical advantages over current physics in pulsoid theory.

Originally Posted by Epsilon=One

As Sir Walter Scott observed, "Oh, what a tangled web we weave."

One would most certainly note this.

[ste]

In addition, why not back up some of the views you rigorously assert:

Speed of light not constant? WHY?
Black holes don't exist? WHY?
No antimatter? WHY?
Universe perpetual? WHY?
Light has Four States? Manifests as mass? WHY?
Gravity an Illusion? Near infinite (Hyper-Relativistic?) speeds? WHY?
Standard Models flawed? WHY?