Galactic Illumination

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

© Mr. Robin Parsons Kingston Ontario Canada MMVII

The dilema of receeding galaxies is a simple study in time logistics.

Current Knowledge (according to actual Images of/from space) tells us that the Universes' edges' exist at ~ 13 Billion Light years Distant (@ 6 trillion Miles per light year it equals 78,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Miles or 78 sextillion{US} miles) and we see galaxies, out there, receeding from us at accelerating speeds....This is actually what we should see as what is going on is Illuminating, or an Illumination event, a Progession of the Light Cone out into the Universe, but the progression of the Light Cone doesn't originate from Here, it originates from out there, hence we sorta see backwards Bit like what Hawking Asked about in his Movie and Book about why doesn't the Film run Backwards well, the Light in the Universe IS doing exactly that and that is why it appears as if they, the outermost galaxies, are accelerating away from us.

Simple Notation, for us to understand we need to realize that if we would want to see those outermost galaxies as they appear in Our Proximities "time of day" (AKA how they exist Today, at our time, here & therefore there too) then we would need advance the/our (Current) Perspective forwards, Evolve it forwards 13 Billion years as what we are looking at occurred many many milenia ago...this is also because our perspective of it tends to want to look at it as if we were outside of it, the reality of our ability to see it, our entire perspective, originates from existing from within it, as it exploded outwards away from 'us'.

The simple reality is that the time that it is Here/Now in our 'local region' of space is exactly the same time that it is out there-Now, just we cannot see it as that because of the Manner in Which the Illumination/Light of it is propagated.

It is because our ability to see "all of what is" (AKA The universe itself) is still evolving, as it is Known that the light from just a 'Little farther Away' (Past the ~ 13 BLY Current Known) One "Light day's" worth of space (16,070,400,000 Miles of Newly illuminated space) will be arriving Here, today.....showing us, still More.

The Illuminations' progression is towards the Beginning of it, not it's end.

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

© Mr. Robin Parsons Kingston Ontario Canada MMVII

So we will start back simply, when we look out, we look backwards into time hence we should see, eventually, the beginning of time.

That is travelling towards us at this very moment, that image, just that it hasn't gotten 'here' ....yet, it is coming out of what is 'out there' that we have yet to see, as the light from those far away regions of space (the outer edge of the universe as it can be seen presently ...from here) hasn't has enough time to travel to us.

We are looking back into history, we have all been told it "started out with great acceleration" so that is what we should see as we look back in time towards the beginning....of 'time'.

(I) know, it is a little bit difficult to grasp...especially as it is still absent of certain elements of knowledge...God's Grace (I)'m Not...but this writing is, and 'current knowledge' is too' at least, as far as (I) know.....

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by Mr. Robin Parsons

So we will start back simply, when we look out, we look backwards into time hence we should see, eventually, the beginning of time.

No. There is no beginning . . . nor ending of time. Reality is perpetual; just as, are any of Nature’s cycles. It is an anthropoidal bias that gives the illusion of linear time.

If you could look backward, you would be looking out from every subatomic manifestation; it would not be relativity's curved spacetime "back of your head" that you would see.

Originally Posted by Mr. Robin Parsons

We are looking back into history, we have all been told it "started out with great acceleration" so that is what we should see as we look back in time towards the beginning....of 'time'.

No. “…we have all been told it [i]"started out with” a Big Bang, which only “banged” once; thus, imparting constant speed; not acceleration. No one in academia has been able to provide a logical explanation for the observed acceleration, which explanation is an integral part of Pulsoid Theory.

Originally Posted by Mr. Robin Parsons

(I) know, it is a little bit difficult to grasp...especially as it is still absent of certain elements of knowledge...God's Grace (I)'m Not...but this writing is, and 'current knowledge' is too' at least, as far as (I) know.....

Yes. Part of the absent knowledge is that the Big Bang is as mythical as “God’s Grace”; neither are rational.

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

© Mr. Robin Parsons Kingston Ontario Canada MMVII

Once again, as apparently you still cannot read? don't Understand? can't control yourself? haven't yet figured it out? aren't smart enough? still think (I)'ll be wishy-washy? like you? and change my mind? or (I)'ll worry that your saying something important and (I)'m missing it?....(I)'m NOT!

GO AWAY!!

&

STAY AWAY!!

Otherwise, well, YOU LOOK STUPID! like you are still trying to goad (Provoke) me ...ONCE AGAIN!!

GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by Mr. Robin Parsons

Otherwise, well, YOU LOOK STUPID! like you are still trying to goad (Provoke) me ...ONCE AGAIN!!

Intent is apparently misunderstood.

No; I'm not trying to provoke you per se. I'm only interested in either correcting your egregious mistakes or attempting to solicit an explanation of why you think as you do.

I know of no other way to arrive at truth, a concurrence, or the exact point at which we disagree.

Getting back to the topic from your unwarrented digression, do you believe that the Big Bang imparted acceleration, as you seem to state? If it did not what do you ascribe as the fundamental source of any acceleration?; and, Why?

Or, more simply: do you believe in the Big Bang? If so, what was it in when it banged???

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

So (naturally) here we have the twit Now defending himself against what he did that is to provoke/GOAD a response from me, NOTHING ELSE

No doubt he tells that he did it for the 'casual reader', not because he is still trying to get at me, why he didn't START ANOTHER THREAD for the casual reader is beyond me, well not really he likes annoying me, if he can soooooooo

See ya!

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by Mr. Robin Parsons

So (naturally) here we have the twit Now defending himself against what he did that is to provoke/GOAD a response from me, NOTHING ELSE

Yes! In search of truth, I am curious if you can defend your stated position in a thread which you started; and, which I contend you are misleading many readers regarding the nature of acceleration.

This is an important subject; you continue to obfuscate and digress . . . seldom are you ever on topic within this forum or armed with any kind of a response to reasoable questions.

It is difficult to conclude that your only interests are other than to display your ego and waste everyone's time with mere. unsupported speculation. Are you incapable of answering a direct question in defense of said speculation, secular and religious faith, and/or personal metaphysical beliefs?

Originally Posted by Mr. Robin Parsons

No doubt he tells that he did it for the 'casual reader', not because he is still trying to get at me, why he didn't START ANOTHER THREAD for the casual reader is beyond me, well not really he likes annoying me, if he can soooooooo

See ya!

There is nothing more annoying than to continue wasting my time on your misleading and off-topic posts. Can't you follow simple forum rules of discourse? If you can't, or won't, support your positions when challenged, why do you post in a forum such as this that is concerned with seeking truth?

There is a pattern to my responding to your posts. If you wish for it to end, can't you determine what triggers my responses?

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Idiot!! Get The *********%^$%#$%^&&**(@(@((@!!!! Out Of My Head!!

Get That??
Jack Ass!

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

All (I )was doing was trying to explain something about the light, (I) already KNOW he has his own answer, anyone intersted in his answers can find them all over the place, but no, not him he needs to advetise himself anywhere and everywhere NO MATTER WHAT, what (I) was trying to do has no need of any imput from him, NONE! and he KNOWS it! (I) CAN ASSURE YOU!! HE KNOWS IT!!

The rest is a complete absence of any respect...period!

Notice he is meeting his own actions, as per reflection/mirroring as (I)need to as (I) have said before, protect myself on the inside too, shortly after he posted His crap, after (I) posted, Then (I) feel him inside me, AGAIN, and (I) DO NOT WANT TO NOT AT ALL!! ...and (I) haven't been because he hasn't been bothering me, not in a while.....just that....

well, MINDLESS ASSHOLE speaks him well as he restrains himself about as well as one can restrain there own flatulence.

(That, you cannot do, but 'Minding your own business' most of you can...easily too)

P.S. Notice how well the 'Spam' filters work, take clear note of it.

[Mr. Robin Parsons]

Could a responsible person please delete this entire thread (I) am truly sorry now that (I) started it! given the Jack a/s/s as sault!

(Now the spam filters work Hee hee)