String Theorists

[astro]

String Theorists & Death Threats Directored Towards Critics!

Snarky String Theorists Silently Supported by Greene, Randall, Kaku, Davies

Yes--I write under a pseudonym because String Theorists' preferred method of debate is ad hominemn attacks and threats.

Ed Witten, Lisa Randall, and Brian Greene sanctify and quietly support legions of useful idiots who rant and rave about String Theory's righteousness and forthcoming success, if we only give it thirty more years and a bilion more dollars. Neither Ed, nor Lisa, nor Brian has ever spoken out against the snarky/mean-spirited behavior of Lubos et al. Ye shall know them by thier fruits.

http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=1284

Page 227 of woit's NOT EVEN WRONG describes some silly attacks on Woit by string theorists:

'... some superstring theorists have chosen to attack me personally [via the Not Even Wrong weblog comments section] ... One of the more excitable of such superstring theorists, a Harvard faculty member, [commented] that those who criticised the funding of superstring theory were terrorists who deserved to be eliminated by the United States military.'

Such behavior seems sanctified by Brian Greene and Michio Kaku and Lisa Randall, who know about it, but have never done anything about it. Never once have any of them criticized Lubos/Susskind for their relentless ad hominem attacks--Lubos translated Greene's The Elegant Universe, and is very useful in perpetuating String Theology via ad hominem attacks, now that it has transcended the limitations of science, logic, and reason and become a political movement. Greene received over $3,000,000 in funding to film his snarky PBS mini-series, and Lubos was hired to shore up support for the government-growing propaganda.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...hominem+smolin
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...d+hominem+woit
http://www.google.com/search?q=sussk...nem+woit&hl=en

I have a Ph.D. in physics and studied at an Ivy League school with a very prominent physics department.

Read this at Peter Woit's blog:
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/w...p=535#comments

Smolin sat down. Duff stood up. It got nasty.

The trouble with physics, Duff began, is with people like Smolin...

Duff is described as "string theorist and man for whom, one imagines, the words 'self' and `doubt' do not often rub shoulders", and seemed to think it was a good idea to answer criticisms of string theory with vociferous ad hominem attacks. Lubos Motl and Clifford Johnson both found Duff's behavior an excellent example for all string theorists, inspiring Clifford to write part VII of his extended attack on me, Smolin and our two books. He admitted somewhere around part V or VI that he actually hadn't looked at the books and had no intention of doing so, and he's pretty steadfast in that attitude.

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/w...p=535#comments

There are hundreds of millions of NSF dollars at stake, and massive egoes that rely on string theory hype to get by.

And so it is that they will do anything to destroy Moving Dimenions Theory, as Paul Davies recycles some ridiculous thirty-year-old article about Time Travel in Scientific American, Brian Greene participates in another snarky-snarky debate with Lenny Susskind, and they recreate science to suit their souls--becuase String Theory has no solution and makes no sense, and because it is the ultimate science, we're at the end of the road here--we can all go home except for string theorists, who need millions more in tax dollars for more tv shows and coffe table books snarking science via postmodern performance art.

String Theory's equation is NO NEW IDEAS = CONTINUED FUNDING AND FREE RIDES FOR NON_THEORIES AND PSEUDO SICENCE

Contrast the group-think billion-dollar Goliath that is String Theory with the simple common-sense of Moving Dimensions Theory: The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. Moving Dimensions Theory accounts for the aetherless aether.

This simple postulate offers a physical model underlying and unifiying:

RELATIVITY:

1) length contraction
2) time dilation
3) the equivalence of mass and energy
4) the constant velocity of light
5) the independence of the speed of light from the velocity of the source

QUANTUMN MECHANICS
1) action at a distance
2) wave-particle duality
3) interference phenomena
4) EPR paradox

THERMODYNAMICS
1) Time's arrow
2) Entropy

STRING THEORY'S MANY DIMENSIONS / KALUZA/KLEIN THEORY
1) a fourth expanding dimension can be interepreted as many dimensions, each time it expands

THE UNITY OF THE DUALITIES
1) wave/particle duality
2) time/space duality
3) energy/mass duality
4) E/B duality

GENERAL RELATIVITY
1) Gravitational redshift
2) Gravity waves
3) Gravitation attraction

THE SPACE-TIME BACKGROUND
1) quantum foam
2) the smearing of space and time at small distances
3) Hawking's imaginary time

PARADOXES
1) MDT explains away Godel's Block Universe
2) MDT unfreezes time
3) Resolves Zeno's Paradox

ONE GETS ALL OF THIS FROM A SIMPLE POSTULATE:

The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions in a sphereically symmetric manner, in units of the Planck length, at the rate of c.

This means that every point in three dimnesional space is always expanding into a fourth dimensional sphere with a radius of the plank length. A photon is matter caught on the surface of this quantized expansion, and thus energy is quantized. The expansion of the fourth dimension occurs at the rate of c, and thus the velocity of all photons is c.

Check out the t-shirt with a simple proof of MDT:

http://www.cafepress.com/autumnrangers.72464949

"The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at the speed of light through the three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is expanding at the rate of c relative to the three spatial dimenions."

How sad it is that when truth stares modern physicists in the face, they must close their eyes so as to get a postdoc or raise more funds for String Theory.

Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all
experimental tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive from the same fundamental physical reality.

Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction. MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source, nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor
Loop Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.

Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies
formerly disparate phenomena within a simple context.

THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.

[Epsilon=One]

Originally Posted by astro

… String Theory has no solution and makes no sense, and because it is the ultimate science, we're at the end of the road here--we can all go home…

String Theory (ST) does have a solution. The solution is found in its roots that were first proposed in 1955 when it was proposed that all phenomena is the consequence of emergent, hyper-relativistic, complex, oscillations of “string-like” harmonic motion that creates dual ellipsoidal quanta that contains resonances that are referred to a Resoloids (fermions). Said Resoloids when traumatically ejected at Critical Compression manifest as bosons.

Said “string-like” harmonic motion proposal evolved to Pulsoid Theory, which is the only alternative theory to Standard Model theory that reconciles with all observation, clearly defines the evolution of all dimensions and the Inverse Square Law (ISL), completes Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem (GIT), and provides a structural force opposed to the illusion of gravity’s ludicrous attraction-at-a-distance without the requirement of the specious Big Bang.

Academic String Theory (ST) and its derivatives are only at the end of an erroneous detour because of their reliance on Standard Model misperceptions.

Pulsoid Theory depends upon a paradigm-shift, a “new physics,” as called for by some of the most eminent world-cla ss theorists.

Originally Posted by astro

String Theory's equation is NO NEW IDEAS

This has become obvious. ST must return to its roots that have evolved to Pulsoid Theory.

Originally Posted by astro

Contrast the group-think billion-dollar Goliath that is String Theory with the simple common-sense of Moving Dimensions Theory: The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.

If said fourth dimension is “time”; than said expansion must be an illusion as the unit of fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) is a constant.

Originally Posted by astro

The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions in a sphereically symmetric manner, in units of the Planck length, at the rate of c.

It is the pulsating, ellipsoidal photon that is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions; thus, red-shift.

Originally Posted by astro

This means that every point in three dimnesional space is always expanding into a fourth dimensional sphere with a radius of the plank length.

Points do not expand; they do however, separate from a dimensionless sphere in the manner of an ellipsoid manifestation; and, that separation because of its unique ellipsoidal geometry does expand at a constant pulsating rate; as, heuristically, described by the Elliptical Constant (EC).

Originally Posted by astro

A photon is matter caught on the surface of this quantized expansion, and thus energy is quantized. The expansion of the fourth dimension occurs at the rate of c, and thus the velocity of all photons is c

The velocity of ellipsoidal photons varies through pulses of all possible speeds at a constant rate of deceleration, that is unnoticeable at anthropic scales, as their minor diameter and wave front curvature increases; thus, red-shift and the particle effect.

Originally Posted by astro

How sad it is that when truth stares modern physicists in the face, they must close their eyes so as to get a postdoc or raise more funds for String Theory.

It is more than “sad”; it is tragic.

Originally Posted by astro

Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity.

Possible so; but; SR and GR are not reconcilable with each other or observation. It is difficult to ascertain how MDT is in “complete agreement” with observed accelerating galactic recession. Or, reconcilable with the requirement of a constant, fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) that is a prerequisite for the exquisite timing required for all sub-atomic phenomena.

Originally Posted by astro

Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum entanglement nor relativistic time dilation.

Time does not dilate; Light dilates. There is more than quantum entanglement; there is also Cosmic entanglement that is evidenced by the infinite speed of gravity’s illusion. I cannot find an explanation for Cosmic entanglement with MDT that accounts for the force of inertia that is imperceptible at anthropic scales; but, quite obvious at the cosmic scale of galaxies.

Originally Posted by astro

Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light…

It is ludicrous to believe that the SOL is constant. Reflection requires a change in speed; Light as a lateral, sinusoidal wave requires the lateral components to move at speeds that vary from the speed of the orthogonal wave-front.

Originally Posted by astro

The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.

This is true if the term “fourth dimension” is a label for a Light quantum.

[Ranana_wamn]

Mr. Speicher, I have another question for you. This is a little bit off-topic, but as I’m the starter of the thread, I think I can permit myself a little bit of straying. Here it is:

If it is true that we arrive at the concept of “Space” by abstracting from existing material objects, then it logically follows that all properties attributed to “space” are also abstracted from those same objects—as Existence is Identity. And by this I mean that when we say, for example, that “space has 3 dimensions”, what that means, literally speaking is that “objects that exist in reality are 3 dimensional”.

This is what we must mean if we are not to reify “space”, and also that every property epistemologically attributed to space must be derived from, and be necessarily dependent on the existing properties of material entities. And from this it follows that we cannot speak of “5 or 10 dimensional space” until we observe “a 5 or 10 dimensional object”. I don’t know if this makes much sense.

Anyway, if it is true, then as we have not yet observed any 10 dimensional entities is there an objective, scientific basis for physicists such as String Theorists to speak of spatial dimensions other than those that we currently observe?